It often begins with something that, retold the next day, would seem almost insignificant: an unanswered message, a forgotten commitment, a tone perceived as distant, a decision made without consulting each other. One partner tries to explain what caused the hurt; the other feels accused and responds by clarifying, correcting, and reconstructing the facts. Within minutes, they are no longer talking about what happened. They are arguing about who started it, who overreacted, who remembers more accurately, and who suffered more. At that point, each person has valid arguments, but neither feels truly reached. The discussion may even end with a flawless reconstruction of the facts and still leave them farther apart. One has proven they were not at fault; the other has obtained the admission they wanted. Yet the relationship has not been understood—it has been put on trial.

In conflicts between partners, the need to be right is rarely only about being right. Beneath the precision of our words may lie a fear of not mattering, of being misunderstood, of losing credibility,…

Full article reserved for members

Continue reading in the Dialogue Rooms.

Membership is free and requires only your name and email address. No identity document or ChatGPT account is required.

Join or sign in for free